Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

FLJS part 3: Criticisms and Answers: Proportionality vs. Strict Scrutiny

Series
Foundation for Law, Justice and Society
Video Embed
Aharon Barak talks about the need for proportionality within human rights law as a means for protecting it against other considerations. Part 3 of the 2009 Foundation for Law Justice and Society Annual Lecture.

More in this series

View Series
Foundation for Law, Justice and Society

Europe on the Brink? Political Issues

Graham Avery, Honorary Director-General of the European Commission, assessees the political implications of the eurozone crisis and suggests Britain may find itself relegated to a secondary role in a two-tier Europe.
Previous
Foundation for Law, Justice and Society

If the Public Would be Outraged by Their Rulings, Should Judges Care?

This Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Annual Lecture, delivered by Professor Cass Sunstein on 24 May 2007, questions the limits and legitimacy of judicial independence in the face of public opinion.
Next

Episode Information

Series
Foundation for Law, Justice and Society
People
Aharon Barak
Keywords
human rights
justice
scrutiny
war on terror
proportionality
law
Department: Centre for Socio-Legal Studies
Date Added: 24/07/2009
Duration: 00:05:11

Subscribe

Apple Podcast Video Apple Podcast Audio Video RSS Feed

Download

Download Video

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Login
'Oxford Podcasts' Twitter Account @oxfordpodcasts | MediaPub Publishing Portal for Oxford Podcast Contributors | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2025 The University of Oxford