Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Series
  • People
  • Depts & Colleges
  • Open Education

The Hard Fact of Life in Big Physics City

Series
The Physics of Fine-Tuning
Video Embed
How similar is the fine-tuning of our universe to probabilistic reasoning we use and understand? Simon Friederich and Erik Curiel go through a series of examples.
In the third part of their discussion, Simon Friederich and Erik Curiel go over the connection between a widely recognized fallacy--the Gambler’s Fallacy--and the fine-tuning argument. How similar is the fine-tuning argument for the multiverse to common ways of reasoning from observations to likelihoods? This discussion was conducted at the University of Oxford on October 6, 2017.

More in this series

View Series
The Physics of Fine-Tuning

Fine-Tuning and the Scientific Process

In the second part of their discussion, Michael Meyer and Suzanne Aigrain talk about the way they, as working physicists, think of fine-tuning in complex planetary systems. This discussion was conducted at Trinity College, Oxford, on February 12, 2016.
Previous
The Physics of Fine-Tuning

No Boundaries for Quantum Cosmology

Where is the observer in the universe? In the fourth part of their discussion, Jim Hartle and Bernard Carr discuss Jim Hartle’s no-boundary proposal.
Next

Episode Information

Series
The Physics of Fine-Tuning
People
Erik Curiel
Simon Friederich
Keywords
philosophy
fine-tuning
Physics
science
philosophy of science
astronomy
multiverse
gambler’s fallacy
Department: Department of Physics
Date Added: 24/04/2018
Duration: 00:14:56

Subscribe

Apple Podcast Video Video RSS Feed

Download

Download Video

Footer

  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Contribute
  • Copyright
  • Contact
  • Privacy
'Oxford Podcasts' Twitter Account @oxfordpodcasts | MediaPub Publishing Portal for Oxford Podcast Contributors | Upcoming Talks in Oxford | © 2011-2022 The University of Oxford