General Philosophy Lecture 8 |
PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 8. |
Peter Millican |
1 December, 2010 |
|
8.4 Persons, Humans and Brains |
Part 8.4. The final part of this series. Explores the distinction between mind and body and whether this makes a difference to the idea of personal identity. |
Peter Millican |
1 December, 2010 |
|
8.3 Problems for Locke's View of Personal Identity |
Part 8.3. Criticisms of Locke's view of personal identity; if personal identity is dependent on memory then how does forgetting personal history and the concept of false memory change Locke's view of personal identity. |
Peter Millican |
1 December, 2010 |
|
8.2 John Locke on Personal Identity |
Part 8.2. Looks at John Locke's view of personal identity; how consciousness and 'personal history' distinguish personal identity and the idea of memory as crucial for personal identity. |
Peter Millican |
1 December, 2010 |
|
8.1 Introduction to Personal Identity |
Part 8.1. Introduces the concept of personal identity, what is it to be a person, whether someone is the same person over time and Leibniz's law of sameness. |
Peter Millican |
1 December, 2010 |
|
General Philosophy Lecture 7 |
PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 7. |
Peter Millican |
1 December, 2010 |
|
7.4 Making Sense of Free Will and Moral Responsibility |
Part 7.4. A brief explanation of Hume's argument for sentimentalism and Robert Kane's views on free will and determinism. |
Peter Millican |
1 December, 2010 |
|
7.3 Hume on Liberty and Necessity |
Part 7.3. Looks at Hume's views on liberty and its relationship to causal necessity; that we have free will but it is causally determined. |
Peter Millican |
1 December, 2010 |
|
7.2 Different Concepts of Freedom |
Part 7.2. Looks at Hobbes' and Hume's views of free will and the three concepts of freedom, and considers the idea of moral responsibility as dependent on free will. |
Peter Millican |
1 December, 2010 |
|
7.1 Free Will, Determinism and Choice |
Part 7.1. Explores the problem of free will and the ideas of moral responsibility, determinism and choice; the need for a concept of freedom to allow free choice, the problems associated with this and asking whether we really have freedom of choice. |
Peter Millican |
1 December, 2010 |
|
General Philosophy Lecture 6 |
PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 6. |
Peter Millican |
30 November, 2010 |
|
6.4 Making Sense of Perception |
Part 6.4. A brief overview of contemporary accounts of perception; including phenomenalism (that objects are logical constructions from sense data) and direct realism (that we perceive objects and the external world directly). |
Peter Millican |
30 November, 2010 |
|
6.3 Abstraction and Idealism |
Part 6.3. Criticisms of the resemblance theory of perception and an introduction to idealism - that perceptions of the external world are all within the mind as ideas. |
Peter Millican |
30 November, 2010 |
|
6.2 Problems with Resemblance |
Part 6.2. Explores Berkeley's and Locke's arguments concerning the resemblance of qualities and objects; that the perceived qualities of objects exist only in the mind or whether secondary qualities are intrinsically part of the object. |
Peter Millican |
30 November, 2010 |
|
6.1 Introduction to Primary and Secondary Qualities |
Part 6.1. Introduces the problem of perception (and the distinction between the world and what we perceive), along with the concepts of primary and secondary qualities. |
Peter Millican |
30 November, 2010 |
|
General Philosophy Lecture 5 |
PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 5. |
Peter Millican |
29 November, 2010 |
|
5.4 Scepticism, Externalism and the Ethics of Belief |
Part 5.4. Looks at the role the concept of knowledge plays in life, the different levels of knowledge we require in certain contexts and the return of scepticism over knowledge. |
Peter Millican |
29 November, 2010 |
|
5.3 Gettier and Other Complications |
Part 5.3. The difference between internalist and externalist accounts of knowledge; whether we need external factors to justify knowledge or whether internal accounts are sufficient, and the Gettier cases. |
Peter Millican |
29 November, 2010 |
|
5.2 The Traditional Analysis of Knowledge |
Part 5.2. Explores the idea of conscious and unconscious knowledge (should a person know that they know something or does it not matter?) and the theory of justification of propositions and beliefs. |
Peter Millican |
29 November, 2010 |
|
5.1 Introduction to Knowledge |
Part 5.1. Looks at the problem of knowledge; how can we know what we know, three types of knowledge and A J Ayer's two conditions for knowledge. |
Peter Millican |
29 November, 2010 |
|
A Tale of Two Churches |
Professor Ben Kaplan (University College London) gives a talk for the 2010 Science and Religious Conflict Conference. Dr Mark Sheehan (Oxford) is the discussant. |
Ben Kaplan, Mark Sheehan |
22 June, 2010 |
|
Religious Toleration and Political Liberalism |
Professor Susan Mendus (York) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference 2010. Dr Nick Southwood (Oxford) is the commentator. |
Susan Mendus, Nick Southwood |
14 June, 2010 |
|
Concluding Remarks |
Professor Richard Dawkins gives a few concluding thoughts on the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. |
Richard Dawkins |
8 June, 2010 |
|
Social psychological aspects of religion and prejudice |
Professor Miles Hewstone (Oxford) gives a talk entitled Social psychological aspects of religion and prejudice: evidence from experimental and survey research. The commentator is Professor Ingmar Persson (Gothenburg University). |
Miles Hewstone, Ingmar Persson |
7 June, 2010 |
|
The relation between the neurobiology of morality and religion |
Professor Patricia Churchland (University of California San Diego) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference.The commentator is Professor Julian Savulescu (Oxford). |
Patricia Churchland, Julian Savulescu |
7 June, 2010 |
|
The view from the East pole: Buddhist and Confucian soteriologies and tolerance |
Professor Owen Flanagan (Duke University) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Dr Guy Kahane (Oxford). |
Owen Flanagan, Guy Kahane |
7 June, 2010 |
|
Personal religion, tolerance, and universal compassion |
Professor Dan Batson (University of Kansas) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Dr Steve Clarke (Oxford). |
Dan Batson, Steve Clarke |
7 June, 2010 |
|
Religious disagreement and religious accommodation |
Professor Tony Coady (University of Melbourne) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Reverend Dr Liz Carmichael (University of Oxford). |
Tony Coady, Liz Carmichael |
7 June, 2010 |
|
Religion and compromise |
Professor Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Duke University) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The discussant is Dr Nick Shackel (Cardiff). |
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Nick Shackel |
7 June, 2010 |
|
Religious Toleration, Religious Freedom and Human Nature |
Professor Roger Trigg (Oxford) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Dr John Perry (Oxford). |
Roger Trigg, John Perry |
7 June, 2010 |
|
Religion, Cohesion and Hostility |
Professor Harvey Whitehouse (Oxford) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Professor Michael Wong (Monash University). |
Harvey Whitehouse, Michael Wong |
7 June, 2010 |
|
Religion as Parochial Altruism |
Professor Ara Norenzayan (University of British Columbia) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Professor John Wilkins (Bond University). |
Ara Norenzayen, John Wilkins |
7 June, 2010 |
|
Is Religion an Adaptation for Inter-Group Conflict? |
Dominic Johnson (Edinburgh) gives a talk for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Dr Russell Powell (Oxford). |
Dominic Johnson, Russell Powell |
7 June, 2010 |
|
Is Religion Adaptive? Integrating Cognition and Function |
Professor Robin Dunbar (Oxford) gives the first presentation for the Science and Religious Conflict Conference. The commentator is Professor Janet Radcliffe-Richards (Oxford). |
Robin Dunbar, Janet Radcliffe-Richards |
7 June, 2010 |
|
Some Fundamental Facts about the Infinite |
Professor Adrian Moore delivers a lecture on the concept of the infinite, a concept with deep philosophical implications. This lecture was given in St Hugh's College as part of the St Hugh's Special Lecture Series. |
Adrian Moore |
14 May, 2010 |
|
Ethics, Hospitality and Radical Atheism: A Dialogue |
Dialogue between Martin Hägglund and Derek Attridge in Wadham College discussing Philosopher Jacques Derrida's ideas on hospitality and the challenge of Radical Atheism. |
Martin Hägglund, Derek Attridge |
16 April, 2010 |
|
General Philosophy Lecture 4 |
PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 4. |
Peter Millican |
8 April, 2010 |
|
4.4 The Mind-Body Problem |
Part 4.4. Looks at some of the modern responses to Cartesian Dualism including Gilbert Ryle's and G. Strawson's responses to the idea. |
Peter Millican |
8 April, 2010 |
|
4.3 Cartesian Dualism |
Part 4.3. Introduces Descartes' idea of dualism, that there is a separation between the mind and the body, as well as some of the philosophical issues surrounding this idea. |
Peter Millican |
8 April, 2010 |
|
4.2 Possible Answers to External World Scepticism |
Part 4.2. Investigates some of the possible solutions to Descartes' sceptical problem of the external world, looking at G.E Moore's response, among others, to the problem. |
Peter Millican |
8 April, 2010 |
|
4.1 Scepticism about the External World |
Part 4.1. Introduces the problem of how do we have knowledge of the world, how do we know what we perceive is in fact what is there? |
Peter Millican |
8 April, 2010 |
|
General Philosophy Lecture 3 |
PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 3. |
Peter Millican |
8 April, 2010 |
|
3.2 Responses to Hume's Famous Argument |
Part 3.2. Responses to and justifications of Hume's argument concerning the problem of induction. |
Peter Millican |
8 April, 2010 |
|
3.1 Hume's Argument Concerning Induction |
Part 3.1. Briefly introduces the problem of induction: that is, the problem that it is difficult to justify claims to knowledge of the world through pure reason, i.e. without experience. |
Peter Millican |
8 April, 2010 |
|
General Philosophy Lecture 2 |
PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 2. |
Peter Millican |
8 April, 2010 |
|
2.7 Overview: Kant and Modern Science |
Part 2.7. Concludes a historical survey of philosophy with Immanuel Kant, who thought Hume was wrong in his idea of human nature and how we gain knowledge of the world. |
Peter Millican |
8 April, 2010 |
|
2.6 David Hume |
Part 2.6. Introduces 18th Century Scottish philosopher David Hume, 'The Great Infidel', including his life, works and a brief look at his philosophical thoughts. |
Peter Millican |
16 March, 2010 |
|
2.5 Nicolas Malebranche and George Berkeley |
Part 2.5. Focuses on Malebranche, a lesser-known French Philosopher, and his ideas on idealism and the influence they had on English philosopher George Berkeley. |
Peter Millican |
16 March, 2010 |
|
2.4 John Locke |
Part 2.4. Introduction to the philosophy of John Locke, 'England's first Empiricist', he also gives a very simplistic definition of Empiricism; we obtain knowledge through experience of the world, through sensory data (what we see, hear, etc). |
Peter Millican |
16 March, 2010 |
|
2.3 Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton |
Part 2.3. An introduction to Robert Boyle's theory of corpuscularianism and Isaac Newton's ideas on mathematics and the universe. |
Peter Millican |
16 March, 2010 |
|
2.2 Thomas Hobbes: The Monster of Malmesbury |
Part 2.2. A brief introduction to Thomas Hobbes, 'The Monster of Malmsbury', his views on a mechanistic universe, his strong ideas on determinism and his pessimistic view of human nature: 'The life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short'. |
Peter Millican |
16 March, 2010 |
|
2.1 Recap of General Philosophy Lecture 1 |
Part 2.1. A brief recap on the first lecture describing how Aristotle's view of the universe, dominant throughout the middle ages in Europe, came to be gradually phased out by a modern, mechanistic view of the universe. |
Peter Millican |
16 March, 2010 |
|
1.4 From Galileo to Descartes |
Part 1.4. Outlines Galileo's revolutionary theories of astronomy and mechanical science and introduces Descartes' (the father of modern philosophy) ideas of philosophical scepticism. |
Peter Millican |
19 February, 2010 |
|
General Philosophy Lecture 1 |
PDF slides from Peter Millican's General Philosophy lecture 1. |
Peter Millican |
19 February, 2010 |
|
1.3 Science from Aristotle to Galileo |
Part 1.3. Describes briefly the Aristotelian view of the universe; the basis for natural science in Europe until the 15th century and its conflict Galileo's theories. |
Peter Millican |
19 February, 2010 |
|
1.2 The Background of Early Modern Philosophy |
Part 1.2. Gives a very brief history of philosophy from the 'birth of philosophy' in Ancient Greece through the rise of Christianity in Europe in the Middle Ages through to the Renaissance, the Reformation and the birth of the Modern Period. |
Peter Millican |
19 February, 2010 |
|
1.1 An Introduction to General Philosophy |
Part 1.1. Outlines the General Philosophy course, the various topics that will be discussed, and also, more importantly, the philosophical method that this course introduces to students. |
Peter Millican |
19 February, 2010 |
|
Nietzsche Source. Scholarly Nietzsche editions on the web |
Introduction to the scholarly editions of Nietzsche Source: the digital critical edition based on Colli/Montinary, the digital edition of the Nietzsche estate including works, manuscripts and letters and the future genetic edition of Nietzsche's works. |
Paolo D’Iorio |
23 December, 2009 |
|
Nietzsche's Value Monism - Saying Yes to Everything |
Lecture on Nietzsche's attack on Value Dualism, as well as the view he offers instead and whether Nietzsche can sustain his Value Monism-the view that everything is good-given the pressures that pull him back into saying no as well as yes. |
John Richardson |
23 December, 2009 |
|
Nietzsche's Metaphysics |
Nietzsche rejects a persisting self; real distinctions of objects and properties, categorical and dispositional properties, causes and effects; free will. He holds that determinism is true, reality is one and fundamentally experiential. |
Galen Strawson |
22 December, 2009 |
|
Consciousness, Language and Nature: Nietzsche's Philosophy of Mind and Nature |
On the triangulation between consciousness, language and nature in Nietzsche's philosophy and contemporary philosophy of mind and proposes a philosophy of signs and interpretation as a basis for a philosophy of mind, language and nature. |
Gunter Abel |
22 December, 2009 |
|
Who is the 'Sovereign Individual?' Nietzsche on Freedom |
Nietzsche's Sovereign Individual (SI) argues that 1. Nietzsche denies free will and moral responsibility. 2. SI in no way supports a denial of 1. 3. Nietzsche engages in a 'persuasive definition' of the language of Freedom and Free Will. |
Brian Leiter |
22 December, 2009 |
|
Nietzsche on Soul in Nature |
This keynote speech examines if, according to Nietzsche, experience of nature is inevitably conditioned by some archetypal phantasm or cultural construction process or if unmediated apprehension of nature is possible. |
Graham Parkes |
22 December, 2009 |
|
The Genealogy of Guilt |
Nietzsche's objective is not to challenge the Christian non-naturalistic account of guilt but to show that Christian representation of guilt is a product of the exploitation of human susceptibility to guilt as instrument of self-directed cruelty. |
Bernard Reginster |
22 December, 2009 |
|
2008 Lecture 6: The Revisability Puzzle Revisited. |
This is the sixth lecture in the 2008 John Locke Lecture series entitled 'Logic, Normativity, and Rational Revisability'. |
Hartry Field |
24 July, 2008 |
|
2008 Lecture 5: Epistemology without Metaphysics |
This is the fifth lecture in the 2008 John Locke Lecture series entitled 'Logic, Normativity, and Rational Revisability'. |
Hartry Field |
24 July, 2008 |
|
2008 Lecture 4: Is that Really Revising Logic? |
This is the fourth lecture in the 2008 John Locke Lecture series entitled 'Logic, Normativity, and Rational Revisability'. |
Hartry Field |
24 July, 2008 |
|
2008 Lecture 3: A Case for the Rational Revisability of Logic. |
This is the third lecture in the 2008 John Locke Lecture series entitled 'Logic, Normativity, and Rational Revisability'. |
Hartry Field |
24 July, 2008 |
|
2008 Lecture 2: What is the Normative Role of Logic? |
This is the second lecture in the 2008 John Locke Lecture series entitled 'Logic, Normativity, and Rational Revisability'. |
Hartry Field |
24 July, 2008 |
|
2008 Lecture 1: A Puzzle about Rational Revisability |
This is the first lecture in the 2008 John Locke Lecture series entitled 'Logic, Normativity, and Rational Revisability'. |
Hartry Field |
24 July, 2008 |
|
2007 Lecture 6: Knowing what we are thinking |
The sixth lecture will try to resolve a familiar tension between externalism about mental content and the assumption that we have some kind of privileged knowledge of the contents of our own thoughts. |
Robert Stalnaker |
10 July, 2008 |
|
2007 Lecture 5: Acquaintance and essence |
Russell held that we must be acquainted with the constituents of the contents of our thoughts, and remnants of this doctrine persist in the work of a number of more recent philosophers. |
Robert Stalnaker |
10 July, 2008 |
|
2007 Lecture 4: Phenomenal and epistemic indistinguishability |
The fourth lecture will begin with a variation on the thought experiment about Mary that is the focus of the knowledge argument, using it to develop the analogy between self-locating knowledge and knowledge of phenomenal experience. |
Robert Stalnaker |
10 July, 2008 |
|
2007 Lecture 3: Locating ourselves in the world |
One strategy for responding to the knowledge argument exploits an analogy between knowledge of phenomenal experience and essentially indexical or self-locating knowledge. |
Robert Stalnaker |
10 July, 2008 |
|
2007 Lecture 2: Epistemic possibilities and the knowledge argument |
The second lecture will begin with Frank Jackson's knowledge argument. The argument and the responses to it turn on assumptions about the nature of the contents of belief and the objects of knowledge. |
Robert Stalnaker |
10 July, 2008 |
|
2007 Lecture 1: Starting in the middle |
Our topic is a subject's knowledge of his own phenomenal experience and of the content of his thought, but I will approach the topic from the outside, treating the subject as an object in the world. |
Robert Stalnaker |
26 June, 2008 |
|